84｜国际援助：prioritise与only的差别
本节题目
We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
读熟范文，理解选择
01 · 引言｜反对只关心本地
Some people argue that we should prioritize helping those within our own communities or countries, rather than extending our assistance to people in other parts of the world. However, I strongly disagree with this view, as I believe that we have a moral responsibility to assist as many people as possible, both locally and globally.
02 · 主体一｜承认本地困难的重要性
On the one hand, I acknowledge that it is crucial to address the issues facing individuals within our own communities. Every society has its share of vulnerable groups, whether they are homeless, unemployed, or suffering from poverty. For instance, even the wealthiest cities in the world often have individuals living on the streets. In response to this, there are numerous ways in which we can contribute, such as volunteering, donating goods, or supporting local charities. Many people in the UK, for example, actively participate in initiatives like providing food at soup kitchens or offering clothing to shelters. Since these problems are visible and immediate, it is understandable why some may believe that helping those within our own borders should be our priority.
03 · 主体二｜说明跨国援助的必要性
However, I contend that we must not limit our charitable efforts to our immediate surroundings. There are numerous instances where people in other countries face far more severe challenges, and in such cases, the impact of our help can be far greater. For instance, in many African countries, children die from diseases that are preventable through vaccinations. A small donation from individuals or governments in wealthier nations could save countless lives. Furthermore, the logistical ease of providing aid to foreign nations, such as funding global vaccination programs or supporting international disaster relief, means that our efforts can make a significant difference beyond our national borders.
04 · 结论｜本地支持与全球援助并存
In conclusion, while it is essential to support our local communities, I believe that national boundaries should not prevent us from offering assistance to those in need elsewhere.
选择与组织 · 为什么这样写
把题目要求拆清楚
题目把无法帮助所有人推到只关心本国；判断这个推论是否成立。
怎样组织段落
承认本地需求→解释国际帮助可能的作用→优先本地不排除国际援助。
为什么这样选择
反对only不要求证明可以帮助所有人；有限资源仍可按紧迫性选择。
语言与精度 · 本节重点
many communities、some situations限制概括，不把整个地区都写成同一种处境。
最后练一练 · 先组织，再写
读熟后，可以先遮住参考，回忆本节最有用的两三句。想动笔时再打开下方写作台，不需要首次学习就完成全文。
定点练习
写一句反驳“不能帮所有人，所以不帮国外”。
写完后看一种参考处理
Limited resources require priorities, but they do not justify excluding all people outside our own country.
检查它修正了什么意义或关系。可以使用不同措辞，但信息需要准确。
换题使用
本站自编迁移题
自编题：Charities cannot solve every problem, so they should focus only on education. Do you agree? 识别only并说明另一类合理需求。
先试一段，再视需要写全文。将新内容写在写作台的“迁移”中；原稿留在“初稿”，修订另存到“修改”。图表题需要重新识别特征，书信与议论文需要重新回应任务。
打开写作台 · 短练、全文与复盘
We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
全文练习至少250词，约40分钟；本节短练可以先写一个主体段。
把读到的表达，写成自己的答案
Task 2 · 全文练习至少 250 词 · 建议 40 分钟
留一个复盘：我能回忆哪组表达？换了内容后，哪一句还不熟？下一次先检查这个问题。