81｜游客票价：税收贡献与旅游收益
本节题目
Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
读熟范文，理解选择
01 · 引言｜明确反对差别票价
It is sometimes suggested that foreign tourists should be charged higher entrance fees than local residents when visiting cultural and historical attractions. However, I completely disagree with this notion.
02 · 主体一｜承认税收理由，再补遗漏
One argument in favor of imposing higher prices on international visitors is that many cultural and historical sites rely on government subsidies for maintenance, meaning that local taxpayers already contribute to their upkeep. While this may seem reasonable, I believe it is a narrow-sighted approach. Foreign tourists significantly boost the host country’s economy through their spending on accommodation, food, transport, and souvenirs. Their contributions extend far beyond entrance fees, making them valuable to the overall financial ecosystem. Instead of viewing them as a financial burden, governments should appreciate their economic input and ensure that cultural sites remain accessible to all visitors.
03 · 主体二｜解释高票价的反作用
Additionally, imposing higher charges on international tourists could deter them from visiting certain destinations. If travelers perceive a country as unwelcoming due to discriminatory pricing, they may choose alternative destinations where they feel more valued. For example, a family comparing two holiday destinations may choose the one where visiting cultural attractions is more affordable. Equal admission charges can help visitors feel welcome and encourage them to explore more of the local heritage. Conversely, if foreign visitors were subjected to higher fees, the tourism sector could suffer, potentially leading to a decline in revenue and fewer resources for site preservation.
04 · 结论｜重申统一票价的判断
In conclusion, maintaining equal entrance fees for both local and foreign visitors fosters tourism growth, economic benefits, and cultural appreciation. Introducing discriminatory pricing would likely discourage international tourists and ultimately be counterproductive.
选择与组织 · 为什么这样写
把题目要求拆清楚
判断外国游客是否应付更高票价；需要比较支持差别收费的理由与反对理由。
怎样组织段落
承认本地税收贡献→游客经济贡献→价格对选择的影响。
为什么这样选择
反驳当地纳税者论点要解释游客的其他贡献，而不是简单说收费不公平。
语言与精度 · 本节重点
不编造景点收费政策；用合理的情境例子即可。
最后练一练 · 先组织，再写
读熟后，可以先遮住参考，回忆本节最有用的两三句。想动笔时再打开下方写作台，不需要首次学习就完成全文。
定点练习
写一条不依赖虚构统计的旅游例子。
写完后看一种参考处理
A family choosing between destinations may prefer the one where cultural attractions are more affordable.
检查它修正了什么意义或关系。可以使用不同措辞，但信息需要准确。
换题使用
本站自编迁移题
自编题：Should non-residents pay higher fees to use public leisure centres? 先解释支持方理由，再回应它。
先试一段，再视需要写全文。将新内容写在写作台的“迁移”中；原稿留在“初稿”，修订另存到“修改”。图表题需要重新识别特征，书信与议论文需要重新回应任务。
打开写作台 · 短练、全文与复盘
Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
全文练习至少250词，约40分钟；本节短练可以先写一个主体段。
把读到的表达，写成自己的答案
Task 2 · 全文练习至少 250 词 · 建议 40 分钟
留一个复盘：我能回忆哪组表达？换了内容后，哪一句还不熟？下一次先检查这个问题。