72｜性别招生：机会平等与名额相等
本节题目
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
读熟范文，理解选择
01 · 引言｜支持机会平等，反对固定配额
The issue of gender equality in university admissions has long been debated. While I strongly believe that both men and women should have equal educational opportunities, I disagree with the notion of universities mandating an equal number of male and female students in every subject.
02 · 主体一｜说明操作困难
Requiring equal numbers of male and female students across all degree programs is, in my view, not a practical approach. The number of students admitted to any given course is typically determined by the number of applications received, not by gender quotas. Universities must maintain flexibility in admissions, as different subjects naturally attract varying numbers of applicants from each gender. For instance, courses in nursing often receive a higher number of female applicants, and enforcing a 50:50 gender split would make it difficult to fill these programs appropriately. Conversely, engineering courses tend to attract more male applicants, and imposing a strict gender balance could lead to a shortage of qualified candidates.
03 · 主体二｜说明择优录取的公平性
In addition to the practical issues outlined, implementing gender quotas in university admissions raises concerns about fairness. The selection process should prioritize merit over gender. Universities should admit students based on their academic qualifications and achievements, ensuring that all applicants—regardless of gender—are assessed according to the same rigorous standards. Replacing merit-based selection with gender-based quotas would undermine the principle of fairness. For example, if a female candidate outperforms a male candidate in terms of qualifications, it would be unjust to admit the male student simply to maintain gender balance, even though the female student is more qualified.
04 · 结论｜保留平等原则与能力标准
In conclusion, while gender equality in education is essential, university admissions should be based on merit rather than gender quotas. Such quotas would not only be impractical but also counterproductive to the goal of providing equal opportunities for all students, regardless of their gender.
选择与组织 · 为什么这样写
把题目要求拆清楚
判断每个专业必须男女各半是否合理；equal numbers不是equal opportunities。
怎样组织段落
申请者结构与可行性→资格选拔与公平→反对固定配额而支持公平机会。
为什么这样选择
先拆开两个“平等”，再论证政策；不要用性别刻板印象代替申请人数与资格分析。
语言与精度 · 本节重点
may attract不同群体不等于某性别天生适合某专业；merit-based selection需与题目保持关联。
最后练一练 · 先组织，再写
读熟后，可以先遮住参考，回忆本节最有用的两三句。想动笔时再打开下方写作台，不需要首次学习就完成全文。
定点练习
写一句区分机会与结果比例的话。
写完后看一种参考处理
Equal educational opportunities do not necessarily require identical numbers of male and female students in every subject.
检查它修正了什么意义或关系。可以使用不同措辞，但信息需要准确。
换题使用
本站自编迁移题
自编题：Universities should reserve equal places for urban and rural applicants. To what extent do you agree? 比较机会公平与固定比例。
先试一段，再视需要写全文。将新内容写在写作台的“迁移”中；原稿留在“初稿”，修订另存到“修改”。图表题需要重新识别特征，书信与议论文需要重新回应任务。
打开写作台 · 短练、全文与复盘
Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
全文练习至少250词，约40分钟；本节短练可以先写一个主体段。
把读到的表达，写成自己的答案
Task 2 · 全文练习至少 250 词 · 建议 40 分钟
留一个复盘：我能回忆哪组表达？换了内容后，哪一句还不熟？下一次先检查这个问题。